![]() edg ☺ ★ 06:03, 19 September 2007 (UTC) Couldn't we just have a photo of a little girl? - SeizureDog 07:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC) No, since that will open a whole new can of worms (privacy, bluring and God-knows what else). ![]() Further complaints about the existing picture won't really address the problem. A better image that conforms to GFDL would be quite welcome. This has been discussed a million billion times. Farix ( Talk) 15:06, 30 August 2007 (UTC) If you want a better picture, contact a Japanese artist and tell them Wikipedia's constraints and the GFDL requirement. ![]() Why do you think they decided on something that's not at all representative of the subject otherwise? - lucid 14:32, 30 August 2007 (UTC) It's not a matter if a lolicon will find the image attractive, but whether the image fairly represents the subject of the article. No lolicon would find that thing attractive. As one who thinks plenty of inappropriate thoughts while reading loli manga, I can tell you that that thing is hideous and must go. The current image ( Image:Lolicon example.jpg) is a terrible example.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |